| China and the World |
Adidas to pay $3.8bn for Reebok
Wednesday, August 3, 2005 Posted: 0953 GMT (1753 HKT)
FRANKFURT (Reuters) -- Germany's Adidas-Salomon is to buy rival sporting goods firm Reebok in a deal worth €3.1 billion ($3.8 billion), Adidas said on Wednesday as it posted a forecast-beating second-quarter profit.
Adidas is the world's No. 2 sporting
goods maker after Nike.
Adidas, the global number two in the sporting goods industry after Nike, is buying all outstanding shares of Reebok, the number three, for $59 per share in cash, Adidas said in a statement. The deal, expected to close in the first half of 2006, is pending the approval of Reebok shareholders and anti-trust authorities. Adidas also said its net income in the second quarter rose by 33 percent to 94 million euros, when adjusted for the sale of its ailing winter sports brand Salomon to Finland's Amer Sports . The figure was above analysts' average estimate of 86 million euros. Sales rose by 8.2 percent to 1.52 billion euros, which was also slightly above the average estimate of 1.49 billion euros, driven by growth in all regions except Europe. For 2005, the Bavarian firm predicted that net income attributable to shareholders from continuing and discontinued operations would rise by 20 percent. News of the Reebok deal came one week after Adidas's smaller rival Puma unveiled plans to close the gap on Adidas and Nike by making acquisitions and entering new markets. Adidas is trying to build its U.S. market share, the company's U.S. head Erich Stamminger told a German newspaper in an interview in June. He said the company's U.S. business had turned around in the second quarter and profit was growing faster than sales. "If we continue to grow like this in the next three years, a market share of 20 percent is already automatically a realistic target," Stamminger was quoted as saying in the Handelsblatt newspaper. In May, Adidas sold its ailing winter sport brand Salomon to Finland's Amer Sports in a deal worth about 485 million euros. Its German rival Puma announced ambitious expansion plans last week. Adidas shares have gained 24 percent in the past three months, outperforming Puma's mid-cap stock, which has risen 16 percent, and Nike's 9 percent share price gain.
11:38 AM - Aug. 9, 2005 - comments {0} - post commentChina firms look abroad to expand
Thursday, July 28, 2005; Posted: 11:04 p.m. EDT (03:04 GMT)
BEIJING, China (CNN) -- While international companies scramble to tap into China's booming markets, some corporations in the Middle Kingdom are looking the other way.
It is not just about exporting the
"Made in China" label, it is about
competing at a global level.
The chairman of one of China's largest providers of management and accounting software, Wang Wenjing from UFIDA Software, has his eyes set far beyond his office in the capital's "Silicon Alley." UFIDA plans to become Asia's leading software vendor by 2006. It already has offices in Hong Kong and Japan, and later this year it will launch branches and joint ventures in other Asian countries. "This is a global market full of international competition. We need to build up our ability to compete internationally. And we need to be able to further expand both our business and markets," Wang told CNN. To do this Wang is calling on American know-how to help take his UFIDA software global. He hired Richard Stewart, who used to work for Germany's Siemens -- he knows China, its markets and is fluent in Mandarin. "There are some things that we will have to overcome, in terms of reputation and in terms of acceptance of a product from a Chinese company. But I think it is slowly changing," says Stewart. China's oil firm CNOOC and its bid for the U.S. firm Unocal highlights the fact that Chinese firms are not just interested in exporting, they are also interested in buying overseas assets, growing brands and competing at an international level. And the Chinese government is encouraging them to do so, but even major players often lack international experience -- this is where international firms come in. UFIDA sent Stewart to a seminar in Beijing by U.S. law firm White and Case to find out about getting government approval for overseas expansion and how to pay taxes in other countries. "Chinese companies are learning that having a good team of advisors, not just lawyers, but accountants, bankers and public relations people, can be invaluable," says John Leary from White and Case. "That is because it is not simply a matter of contracts, but there is also a lot of strategy." CNOOC found out that its overseas aspirations had as much to do with politics as business. (Full Story) Wang hopes that when UFIDA is ready to make a bid for a U.S. company, it will be in a less politically charged atmosphere. "I like to say business is business. It is a benefit for both of us," says Wang. It is not just about having the "made in China" label on the shelf, it is also about having a global headquarters based in China. 9:57 AM - Aug. 5, 2005 - comments {0} - post commentReport: CNOOC set to scuttle bid
Friday, July 29, 2005 Posted: 0126 GMT (0926 HKT)
HONG KONG, China (AP) -- CNOOC Ltd, China's third-largest oil producer, plans to scuttle its bid for Unocal Corp as early as next week because political pressure from Washington has made the deal impossible, a Hong Kong newspaper reported Friday citing unidentified sources.
Chairman and Chief Executive officer
of China National Offshore Oil
Corporation ( CNOOC ) Fu Chengyu.
"There is literally no point to pursue this any further. The dirty Washington politics has basically killed the deal," the South China Morning Post quoted a source "who is familiar with the deal" as saying. CNOOC did not immediately return the AP's calls before business hours early Friday morning. Unocal -- based in El Segundo, California -- first agreed to be acquired by Chevron in April for $16.6 billion in cash and stock. But two months later, Hong Kong-based CNOOC -- 70 percent owned by the Chinese government's China National Offshore Oil Corp -- offered $18.5 billion in cash, or $67 a share, for Unocal. The bid sparked fears in Congress that the proposed deal presented risks to America's economic and national security. A flurry of legislation intended to derail CNOOC has been introduced in both houses of Congress. Last week, Chevron sweetened its offer for Unocal to $17 billion, and Unocal's board recommended shareholders, scheduled to meet on Aug. 19, approve the deal.
From CNN 9:55 AM - Aug. 5, 2005 - comments {0} - post commentCNOOC launches $18.5bn Unocal bidFriday, June 24, 2005 Posted: 0117 GMT (0917 HKT)
NEW YORK (Reuters) -- CNOOC Ltd., China's largest offshore oil producer, has offered to buy Unocal Corp. for $18.5 billion, in a bid to trump Chevron Corp.'s $16.4 billion deal to acquire the smaller U.S. oil producer. A person close to the process, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters Thursday the preliminary decision was made after CNOOC's board of directors met for several hours in Beijing Wednesday night. CNOOC said it offered to pay $67 in cash for each Unocal share, setting the stage for a potential bidding war with Chevron Corp. The Financial Times reported on its Web site that the bid would be worth over $19 billion, or at least $65 per Unocal share, in addition to taking on $1.6 billion of debt. Unocal said it would evaluate CNOOC's offer, but said its board continued to back its previously agreed deal with Chevron Corp. Chevron said it stood behind its April agreement to buy Unocal Corp. A Chevron spokesperson said its Unocal deal is "highly likely to close, while the CNOOC proposal must undergo an extensive regulatory process in the United States and elsewhere." A top Chevron executive said the company could close the deal as soon as August. "We're doing everything we can to move this quickly," George Kirkland, Chevron's global head of exploration and production, said at the Reuters Energy Summit in New York Wednesday. "I think we could be closed in the August timeframe." Chevron in April beat out CNOOC and other potential suitors to win a tight race to ink a deal to buy Unocal, which has an attractive portfolio of assets in Asia, for about $16.4 billion. Chevron would also take on $1.6 billion in debt. The Chevron deal carries a $500 million break-up fee, meaning any new suitor would have to pay Chevron $500 million. Political hurdles If CNOOC was to acquire Unocal, it would be the biggest-ever overseas acquisition by a Chinese firm. Most watchers have said a counter-bid would harm CNOOC due to high costs, and investors have already been penalizing CNOOC by dumping its shares. It also faces political obstacles in the United States given that CNOOC Ltd. is largely controlled by the Chinese government. Energy Secretary Sam Bodman refused to speculate Wednesday on how the Bush administration would react to a bid by CNOOC for Unocal, except to say it would trigger a "complex" government review. CNOOC, with over $1.4 billion in overseas investment, aspires to become a major regional liquefied natural gas producer. It made a last-minute decision earlier this year not to bid for Unocal in the face of opposition from some independent board directors. CNOOC's original planned bid was more attractive than Chevron's offer -- structured as 75 percent in Chevron stock and the rest in cash. Despite Chevron's winning bid, CNOOC said as recently as this month it was still considering a counter-offer. Industry sources say CNOOC's new management, led by chairman Fu Chengyu, is eager to make its mark and to boost the domestic ranking of CNOOC, now a distant number three after PetroChina and Sinopec. Copyright 2005 Reuters. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
2:58 AM - Jun. 26, 2005 - comments {0} - post commentNo contest as Beijing's man takes top Hong Kong jobJonathan Watts in Beijing As predicted after he had been endorsed by Beijing, Mr Tsang avoided a contest for the territory's top political post after two potential rivals failed to secure enough nominations to mount a challenge. At the close of nominations yesterday, Mr Tsang said he had secured the support of 710 members of a 796-seat electoral committee, which is packed with Beijing's supporters. An election, scheduled for July 10, will be cancelled. "The process was very smooth," Mr Tsang said at his campaign office. "I feel very excited. I feel I have more responsibilities". Although the selection process has angered democrats who are calling for universal suffrage, Mr Tsang's appointment is likely to be welcomed by most people in Hong Kong. Polls show he is supported by 70% of them. This is in sharp contrast to his predecessor, Tung Chee-hwa, who stood down in March, two years before the end of his term. Although he cited ill-health as the reason for his resignation, the first post-colonial leader of the territory was widely believed to have been pushed out by Beijing because he mishandled the Sars crisis, failed to push through an anti-subversion law, and became such a figure of hate that hundreds of thousands of protesters joined pro-democracy marches. Mr Tsang, who was Mr Tung's deputy, will have only two years to show he is better at the difficult balancing act required of a leader under the one-country, two-system formula that gives Hong Kong more autonomy than anywhere else in China. When he completes the remaining term of his predecessor in 2007, the selection process must take place again. A pragmatist rather than an ideologue, Mr Tsang is not expected to push for major political reforms in the interim. But his rivals in the leadership race - pro-democracy lawmaker Lee Wing-tat and legislator Chim Pui-chung -said the method of selection-through-nomination was unfair because Mr Tsang had refused a debate, there had been no equality of access to the media, and members of the selection committee had had no opportunity to make a choice through secret ballot. Mr Lee said he had only been able to collect 51 endorsements because potential supporters had been put under heavy pressure by the pro-Beijing camp. "If they show any intention to nominate me, they will receive many phone calls," he told Associated Press. Until the end of British rule in 1997, Hong Kong's leader. was not elected, but was appointed by London. The current voting system is a plutocratic hodge-podge agreed by both governments before the handover. China has blocked further reforms. Despite his close links with the democratic camp, Mr Tsang has veered away from political reform. Instead, he has focused on maintaining the territory's economic advantage over the mainland. The pillars of Hong Kong's success, he says, are an independent judiciary, a level playing field, a clean, efficient civil service and the free flow of information. Yesterday, the legislator Leung Kwok-hung, known as Long Hair, led a small group of protesters outside Tsang's office. He scuffled with security guards and shouted: "Shame on you, Donald Tsang _ Small-circle election. It's worse than pigs and dogs." 12:51 PM - Jun. 16, 2005 - comments {0} - post commentTaking care of its coreJun 6th 2005 From The Economist Global Agenda Apple is set to announce that it will switch its computers from microprocessors supplied by IBM and Motorola to those made by Intel, the world¡¯s biggest chipmaker. Emboldened by the success of its iPod music player, this is Apple¡¯s latest move in an attempt to return to the mass market ASK people to describe their computers. Most, with a shrug, will mention a couple of grey-coloured (or is that cream?) boxes, and software that crashes occasionally. But the sliver of the population who own one of Apple¡¯s products are more likely to enthuse about the cool design of their hardware and the robustness and user-friendliness of their software. It is a surprise, then, that more people don¡¯t chose the American firm¡¯s computers. This is what Steve Jobs, its chief executive, hopes to put right. On Monday June 6th, Mr Jobs was set to use the platform of Apple¡¯s annual developers conference to announce that the firm will switch from the chips supplied by IBM and Motorola for over a decade to products from Intel, the world¡¯s biggest chipmaker. The first products with Intel chips should be available next year. Most observers suggest that the move is part of a strategy dedicated to returning Apple to the mass market for computers, which it dominated before the advance of Microsoft and Intel in the 1980s. There are several suggestions about what prompted the change. Apple blamed it current chip suppliers for slow delivery last year, which held up production of some lines. And chip development has not lived up to promises Apple made for improvements in processing speed. Intel¡¯s chips are faster and run cooler than Apple¡¯s current chips. And cooler chips are important for the production of better laptops, a market growing considerably faster than that for desktop PCs. But there is much speculation that Intel can simply supply chips more cheaply than IBM and Motorola, and that Apple can use the saving to cut the retail price of its computers. Apple¡¯s problems in increasing its market share are, to a large extent, a result of the high prices it charges for its computers compared with similar products from the likes of Dell or Hewlett-Packard. Apple sold only around 2.3% of new desktop and laptop computers worldwide in the first quarter of 2005, according to IDC, a research firm. Dell commanded 18.9% of the market, HP 15.4%. But Apple is concentrating hard on ways to improve its market share and is banking on the huge success of the iPod, its digital music player, to create a ¡°halo effect¡± and speed the revival of Apple as a force in world computing. The firm¡¯s recovery has been apparent for 18 months, after several years in the doldrums. In 2004, Apple¡¯s net profits were four times higher than the year before, at $276m, and in mid-April the firm announced another blistering set of quarterly results: revenues up by 70% compared with the same period the year before, and net profits 530% higher, at $290m; Apple shipped over 1m computers (a 43% rise) and a staggering 5.3m iPods (over six times more than the year before). The iPod has done wonders for Apple, providing not only profits but a positive brand image to a swathe of new young consumers. Though the iPod was derided by some as exorbitantly expensive at the time of its launch in 2001, it has amassed some two-thirds of the world market for hand-held music devices. And not content with anything less than total domination, in January Apple introduced the iPod shuffle, a flash-memory player, which is naturally smaller and better looking than anything the competition can yet muster. No wonder iTunes, Apple¡¯s online music store, leads the field. But Apple still makes most of its cash from computers, and to extend its product range it introduced the Mac mini at the beginning of the year. This small, relatively cheap computer comes without ¡°peripherals¡±¡ªcustomers can add their own keyboard, mouse or screen. This helps to keep costs low and so, it is hoped, will nudge more users of Microsoft¡¯s Windows to switch to Apple. Mr Jobs hopes to spread the Apple message further still through a network of Apple retail stores. There are now over 100 around the world in prized locations. The lead that the iPod has in the hand-held music player market looks unassailable for the time being. That said, Bill Gates is touting Microsoft¡¯s own software format, Windows Media, to several online music services and hardware firms, hoping to set a rival standard with greater interoperability. At present, iTunes offerings only work with the iPod. Mr Gates suggests that the convergence of mobile phones and music players (using his software, of course) could threaten the iPod¡¯s dominance. Apple should take the threat seriously. Nokia recently announced that it was preparing to launch a handset with a hard drive. Sony Ericsson will unveil its first Walkman phone later this year. To counter these threats, a deal between Motorola and Apple is expected to spawn phones with iTunes included in a couple of months. If Apple is to make the most of the halo effect from the iPod to push its upmarket computers on greater numbers of customers, it would be well to do so as soon as it can. Such is the importance of the iPod to Apple that on June 3rd the firm¡¯s shares fell by 4.5% after analysts suggested that sales of the device may be flat in the current quarter. If the halo slips, Apple may have to content itself with selling its wares just to the select, fashion-conscious bunch who presently make up the company¡¯s loyal fan base.2:54 PM - Jun. 7, 2005 - comments {0} - post commentChina to increase export tariffsBeijing rejects calls to revalue currencyFriday, May 20, 2005 Posted: 0608 GMT (1408 HKT)
The yuan is pegged at a value near
8.28 to the U.S. dollar.
BEIJING, China -- China will drastically raise export tariffs on 74 categories of textile products beginning June, the government has said, in an apparent effort to meet U.S. and European demands to stem the flood of cheap Chinese goods.
The increase could be as much as 400 percent for most of the products, the Xinhua News Agency said in a one-sentence dispatch, according to The Associated Press. No other details were given. China faces pressure from the United States, the European Union and other producers to restrain its textile exports, which have soared since a global quota system ended on January 1. The United States on Wednesday imposed quotas to limit growth of Chinese imports to 7.5 percent a year. They apply to men's and boy's cotton and man-made fiber shirts, man-made fiber trousers, man-made fiber knit shirts and blouses, and combed cotton yarn. On May 13, Washington imposed similar restrictions on Chinese-made cotton trousers, cotton knit shirts and underwear. The limits come a day after the U.S. Treasury pointedly called for Beijing to allow a revaluing upwards of its currency, the yuan, which the U.S. says is giving an unfair advantage to Chinese manufacturers. Chinese clothing imports, including man-made fiber shirts and blouses, will now be subject to quota limits, according to a U.S. Commerce Department release. Last Friday the department put quotas on cotton trousers and knit-shirts and a range of underwear. The latest restrictions demonstrated "the administration's continued commitment to America's textile manufacturers and their employees," Commerce Department Secretary Carlos Gutierrez said in a statement released Wednesday. "We will enforce our trade agreements to ensure that U.S. companies get a fair deal as they compete in the global marketplace," he said. The department said the clothing categories cited were threatening to disrupt the U.S. market. Shipments of Chinese textiles and apparel to the U.S. have surged since the end of global quotas on January 1. Last year the U.S. ran up a $162 billion trade deficit with China. U.S.-based manufacturers say China's system of pegging the value of the yuan at around 8.28 to one U.S. dollar undervalues the Chinese currency by as much as 40 percent. An artificially weak yuan makes Chinese goods cheaper in the U.S. and American products more expensive in China. The U.S. Treasury said Tuesday that if China yuan policy was "highly distortionary" and posed a risk to China's economy, its trading partners and global economic growth. China has rejected the suggestion that it should immediately allow its currency to revalue. Chinese Commerce Minister Bo Xilai said Wednesday the charges made by the U.S. Treasury were unfounded. "I believe they are not reasonable," Bo told Reuters. The latest U.S. quota move will see the named import categories to increase this year by just 7.5 percent compared with shipments over a 12-month base period. The U.S. has the power to set the limits on Chinese goods under an agreement that cleared the way for Beijing's membership in the World Trade Organization in 2001. The American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, a textile industry group, praised the move Wednesday. "Failure to act would have cost tens of thousands of U.S. jobs," the group's executive director, Auggie Tantillo, said, according to The Associated Press. But Laura Jones, executive director of the United States Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel, was critical. "These restrictions on imports from China will do absolutely nothing to help the U.S. textile industry -- and the government knows it," AP quoted Jones, whose group includes large retailers, as saying.
12:51 AM - May. 21, 2005 - comments {0} - post comment
|
Description Watching China, Watching the Rest of the World With a Special Focus On the Economy, Particularly Chinese Enterprises Foreign Expansion and Corporate Globalization. More about China By CIA WorldFactBook By Wikipedia Home User Profile Archives Recent Entries - blogs updated - Beijing chooses 5 dolls for Olympic mascot - Yahoo buys $1bn stake in Alibaba - Marconi faces backlash over Huawei talks - Not Bad, Baidu - Baidu.com Gets Rousing Welcome - Baidu.com ready for Nasdaq debut - Adidas to pay $3.8bn for Reebok - China firms look abroad to expand - Report: CNOOC set to scuttle bid Links Economist BusinessWeek Far Eastern Economic Review Fortune Forbes TIME NewsWeek Guardian The New York Times Reuters Associated Press Agence France-Presse Bloomberg CNN BBC C-Span Wired Singapore United Morning Post Email Me Free Hit Counter |