Simplicity
Well, I finished the preface of Leaves Of
Grass today under interesting circumstances. Sitting and waiting for my
tires to be changed. It took 5 hours! Mostly due to incompetence, but
that's another whole story because the new tires are happily on my
vehicle and I should be good to go for at least another 5 years. So,
back to Whitman. I'm glad it took them 5 hours - I got to bite &
chew, bite & chew my way through the preface. I decided to save the
poems themselves for another day. There's 12 poems, so should take a
few readings to chew on those again. Cheated and found out this is not
the Leaves of Grass I read as a young grizzly. This is a copy the first
edition (I peeked at the afterword a bit - this is put out in
anniversary of the 150th year since it's first publication). The
paperback I had torn into was something like "the complete leaves of
grass" because Whitman kept adding to it year after year till it got
itself good and thick.
The preface was both a chore and a joy. Lots and lots of quoatable lines & lots of lots of "lemme think a bit". It's put together in a pretty complex manner, mostly trying to convince the reader that they are in the presence of great poetry. Lots of lopsided arguments trying to prove that, but still fun to read through and consider swallowing. The funniest bit arrives just about right smack dab in the middle of this fairly densely worded 14 page diatribe:
The preface was both a chore and a joy. Lots and lots of quoatable lines & lots of lots of "lemme think a bit". It's put together in a pretty complex manner, mostly trying to convince the reader that they are in the presence of great poetry. Lots of lopsided arguments trying to prove that, but still fun to read through and consider swallowing. The funniest bit arrives just about right smack dab in the middle of this fairly densely worded 14 page diatribe:
"The art of art, the glory of
expression and the sunshine of the light of letters is simplicity.
Nothing is better than simplicity. . .nothing can make up for excess or
for the lack of definiteness."
The preface, to this reader, is not simple. I have a hard time making
up my mind if the preface is excess or simply full of definiteness. I'm
sure Whitman's call would be that his verboseness is simply because of
his complete attempt to be definite. I can simply say I'm not sad I
read it, and I would recommend it as a good read for anyone interested
in high ego gratification (on Whitman's part).[ 8:41 PM ] [ Jun. 6, 2005 ] [ Post Comment ]